Click on the County name to see a copy of the Commission’s Final Equalization Order for that County
✓ = The County has that category of property but that there were no adjustments made to that category.
Residential = Residential class of real property and its subclasses.
Commercial = Commercial and industrial class of real property and its subclasses.
Agricultural = The agricultural land and horticultural land class of real property not subject to special valuation and its subclasses.
Special Value = Special Value for the agricultural land and horticultural land class receiving special valuation and its subclasses.
# | County | Residential | Commercial | Agricultural | Special Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Adams | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
2 | Antelope | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
3 | Arthur | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
4 | Banner | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
5 | Blaine | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
6 | Boone | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
7 | Box Butte | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
8 | Boyd | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
9 | Brown | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
10 | Buffalo | +5% Valuation Grouping 10 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
11 | Burt | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
12 | Butler | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
13 | Cass | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
14 | Cedar | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
15 | Chase | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
16 | Cherry | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
17 | Cheyenne | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
18 | Clay | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
19 | Colfax | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
20 | Cuming | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
21 | Custer | +10% Valuation Grouping 1 | ✓ | ✓ | |
22 | Dakota | +5% | ✓ | ✓ | |
23 | Dawes | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
24 | Dawson | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
25 | Deuel | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
26 | Dixon | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
27 | Dodge | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
28 | Douglas | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
29 | Dundy | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
30 | Fillmore | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
31 | Franklin | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
32 | Frontier | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
33 | Furnas | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
34 | Gage | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
35 | Garden | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
36 | Garfield | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
37 | Gosper | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
38 | Grant | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
39 | Greeley | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
40 | Hall | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
41 | Hamilton | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
42 | Harlan | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
43 | Hayes | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
44 | Hitchcock | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
45 | Holt | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
46 | Hooker | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
47 | Howard | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
48 | Jefferson | +40% Valuation Grouping 11, Land Component Only | ✓ | ✓ | |
49 | Johnson | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
50 | Kearney | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
51 | Keith | +9.5% Valuation Grouping 5, Improvements Only | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
52 | Keya Paya | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
53 | Kimball | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
54 | Knox | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
55 | Lancaster | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | +8% |
56 | Lincoln | +17% Valuation Grouping 3, and +8.5% Valuation Grouping 4 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
57 | Logan | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
58 | Loup | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
59 | Madison | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
60 | McPherson | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
61 | Merrick | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
62 | Morrill | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
63 | Nance | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
64 | Nemaha | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
65 | Nuckolls | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
66 | Otoe | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
67 | Pawnee | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
68 | Perkins | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
69 | Phelps | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
70 | Pierce | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
71 | Platte | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
72 | Polk | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
73 | Red Willow | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
74 | Richardson | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
75 | Rock | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
76 | Saline | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
77 | Sarpy | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
78 | Saunders | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
79 | Scotts Bluff | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
80 | Seward | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
81 | Sheridan | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
82 | Sherman | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
83 | Sioux | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
84 | Stanton | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
85 | Thayer | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
86 | Thomas | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
87 | Thurston | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
88 | Valley | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
89 | Washington | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
90 | Wayne | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
91 | Webster | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
92 | Wheeler | +13% Valuation Grouping 4 | ✓ | ✓ | |
93 | York | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |